Romano Di Bernardo ----------------------------------- -
The Certificate of Honour allotted by the Centre National UFO with whom he recognizes Romano Di Bernardo "THE POSITIVE PERSONAL COMMITMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ISSUES REFERRED ufology AND RELATED PHENOMENA "------ -----------------------------------
I read with interest the article on UFO Newsletter " Ghibaudo: A Note "by Roberto Pinotti, where, among other things, states:" ... .. Di Bernardo is and remains a serious professional who has had the great merit have addressed the positive wave of 1978 in the Adriatic ... ". This recognition by the President of CUN summary, on the other, a diploma of honor signed by his own manager Roberto and consegnatomi from CUN in Abruzzo D'Alfonso, can not fail to tell some facts related in one way or another to 'out of the book by Stephen Breck "ground contact". Just because I treated the matter with UFO balance, even if by mere "observer ufologist laborer, today I feel compelled, after so many years by the wave of 1978 and the events described in the book in question, to intervene to criticize 'whole' operation amcizia "that threatens to destroy the credibility of those who have seriously investigated the mystery of this disc volanti.A Ghibaudi photos of the 1961" Settimana Incom "are nothing in front of the scenes of the aliens and W56 CRT infiltrated under our cities and our seas. To me the photo (only one) is a model taken a few inches above the ground. Even a child, observing the basic scenario, you notice. Then, as he says in the preface of the book itself Pinotti of Breccia. ".. Anyone is free to believe what he wants. And clearly this is a problem not ours, about which everyone can find an answer, right or wrong. "Everyone is free to believe whatever he wants, all right, but when they joined the CUN I noticed that the "contactees" who went on television to tell of being abducted by aliens, we were the CUN considered with due caution and scoundrels were banned because the CUN was able to apply for accreditation as a benchmark in serious relationship with the media and authorities. And precisely because of this positive image, I participated as an observer in the investigation of the CUN sull'affondamento the boat of the brothers De Fulgensiis often in collaboration with the military and the Master's Porto.Nel 1961 because I saw Roberto Pinotti, and some other serious scholars UFO very distant from sellers of stories and fables about men and green space travel to distant planets aboard alien craft. Between one and the other was a deep groove and TV appearances of the President of CUN were invariably marked by a line of concrete study of the UFO phenomenon through witnesses and exhibits likely visual verifiable through extensive laboratory testing. . Having said that output in the library of "ground contact" I literally rushed to book it because I realize if the book Breccia really tell the story that the author had anticipated us in a meeting with the guys UFOBSERVER to which I was invited too. When the proper Stefano began to describe some details of the events of "FRIENDSHIP" I told him frankly that I did not believe the story that had the deceased Bruno Sammaciccia. I also told him that I had got to know him as a scientist and author of esoteric sacred books just a few years before the wave of 1978 and that during the "heat" of his work as "representative" on the book Land of W56.Purtroppo went far beyond the anticipations of Broken and then contained a preface by Roberto Pinotti. I devoured the book in two nights and stressed the steps and leave out the most interesting mathematical formulas. When the author starts to describe the story of a friendship track a profile of Bruno Sammaciccia and refers to his irreproachable conduct and the fact that "has even been denounced, and underwent a process for alleged circumvention of an incapable (by poor people who blame attributed to Bruno that they were dispossessed by one of their wealthy relative) Needless to say that Bruno was acquitted ... "From this it follows that story of friendship collected by Breccia, a friend of Sammaciccia is credible because it comes from an honest person and therefore credible. And the reader also argues that the preface Pinotti is in line with the thesis of the author and that the President of CUN believe his story. But is it enough to stake a reputation as a serious scholar and a group like the CUN presenting a beautiful legend as true story? One thing is certain: knowing that both Breccia Pinotti are some who believed the story and then Sammaciccia are definitely in good faith .---------------------- - the next episode will illustrate some curious and unusual facts of life in those years Pescara, which pertain to the history of the aliens in Sammaciccia was "Trust." (continued)
0 comments:
Post a Comment