I'm not used to think in terms of "conspiracy", pardon the term, but it made me think the question that has set itself a friend who follows the story of Ufology by at least 10 years referring to publication of the book by Stephen Breck ground contact "... What motivated them to disclose now a story like this (its already questionable) relying on lies and outright lies, even when the base of the history of W56 something might even be true? ". Frankly I do not know what to say because for years I know and follow the work of Roberto Pinotti and I am sure that his participation in Operation BRECCIA was based on the credibility of the emeritus professor who has published the story of friendship convinced of the bona fide of the late Bruno Sammaciccia.Iniziando the narrative of this third part on the legend of "aliens Pescara" in order to avoid misunderstandings, I want to express very clearly the underlying motivation of my writings for the benefit of those who come to read these notes and I do not know. According to his friend Roberto Pinotti I'd be a ".... A serious professional who has had the great merit of having dealt with the positive wave of 1978 in the Adriatic." I can only thank the President of CUN for this public recognition, but I want to clarify, if the noun is referring to my professional journalistic activities, which are not a professional journalist in his youth, even if I had the opportunity to work for about 4 years in the preparation of a Roman newspaper Pescara (without contract), I have filled many pages of magazines and have published several libri.Fatta this necessary clarification that, I suppose, little interest to most of that small group friends who attend this portal amateur managed for other non-profit entirely at my expense, I would also point out that my past activities in the CUN is a pleasant interlude of my life with amici.Passiamo now to the motivation underlying these my writings. I have already explained in the previous installments of me is too much to heart the matter serious ufology to accept the contents of the book ground contact for the part that refers to the W56 and CRT. But what justifies to a certain extent these my contribution if the author, in dealing with the part that most struck me, as Trulli and as "a laborer of ufology," I am of course referring to the chapter on friendship, he narrated the events and really had described the historical characters, the actors involved in this affair, supported by a minimum of documentazione.In other words, in the story "Friendship", to affirm a presumption of absolute credibility of the Sammaciccia, describes the same as a person beyond reproach, above suspicion, the author of sacred books, devotee of St. Francis, patron repaid with ingratitude of "poor people" who have denunciato.Breccia to make more credible the protagonist says that he was acquitted "with full formula" and then informs us about the religious publications of the trustee in Italy of the W56 and on its relations with other prelates and generals. There has, however, informed the "poor" legal proceedings from which Sammaciccia did not go out at all "acquitted" and avoided the worst of crimes simply because, on appeal, were prescribed in a form which I'll explain later .****** *** I think Stefano Breccia, as I wrote in the previous episode, is in good faith that he believed the story of his friend and broke Sammaciccia published. He sinned, however, of lightness. It is primarily concerned to describe it as a credible person in a few lines that was denounced by people and defined by the "poor people" together his wife and Giancarlo De Carlo. Let's see what comes out from reading the court documents:
"... Judgement against Sammaciccia Bruno, ... MR, Giancarlo De Carlo ... free - contumacious accused of Articles 110, 640 and n. 61 5:07 cp-because the competition between them and his wife MR Sammaciccia perspective capable miraculous and supernatural, De Carlo itself as an intermediary - the document continues - with artifice and deception consisted in the CG and BM in fear, danger of life and for incurable diseases, taking advantage of the depressed state of psychophysical C., deceives him (which would also lead to profitable investment of money) so that the same C. Sammaciccia delivered to the total sum of L. 624,000,000 by bank checks drawn on the c / c No (Omission) of the (omitted) made payable to people diverse.Con significant effect of unjust profits for defendants and subsequent damage to the C. of significant gravità .In Pescara and Montesilvano between October 1991 and March 1992. "So this is the charge that led to the conviction in 1997, at first instance, the three persons who, according to the book published by Stefano Breccia , were later acquitted, I suppose you would say let's appello.Ma ordine.Dalla ruling of the Magistrate's District Prison in Pescara (art. 544 et seq., 549 cpp) "...
THE Magistrate, having regard to the Code of Criminal Procedure states and 535 artt.533 Sammaciccia Bruno, MR, and Giancarlo De Carlo guilty of the crime being prosecuted in the competition of extenuating circumstances, considered to be prevalent on these alleged aggravating and each sentenced to the punishment of two years and six months of imprisonment and L. 1.5 million in fines, as well as to pay the costs processuali.Visti Articles. 538 et seq. CPP condemns the same Sammaciccia Bruno, MR, and Giancarlo De Carlo compensation in solid form part of civil CG and BM, which assigns the meantime a provisional interim executive L. 624,000,000 and to reimburse the costs of these proceedings, to clear, as to C., in total L. 2,551,000, of which L. 2,525,000 for lawyers' fees, plus VAT and CAP and, with regard to B. in total L. 1,842,000, of which L. 1.79 million for lawyers 'fees, plus VAT and CAP.Pescara, 5/12/1997. "The defendants appealed and
date October 11, 2002" ... The Court of Appeals in partial reform states, considered the' equivalence between mitigating and aggravating, nlp for prescription .... IRREVOCABLE JUDGEMENT 28/12/2002 ".****************************** * Now I do not think so that the civilian part of the process (represented by the lawyer. Leonardo Lottery) was composed of "poor people" as stated on ground contact. To me it sounds like a statement is not documented that casts a shadow of reasonable doubt on the content of the entire publication that also offers interesting and intriguing aspects. Rubble from the documents that definitely had no way of knowing that Sammaciccia, in the event of the complaint which is discussed on page 180 did not behave with "... the spiritual nobility exhibited at any time by its stakeholders ...". . It records the events mentioned by the Emeritus Professor is directly linked to the legend of aliens that have invaded the Abruzzo region and the world and that they had chosen as their representative to the "healer" of Montesilvano. It's not a mishap in any court nor I, and, I suppose, or readers of the volume would have given, but an episode that the author has published even reversing the roles of actors and Sammaciccia making it appear as a victim. Breccia has brought to limelight with his book a false story on the outcome of a process which once was widely taken up by the press of Abruzzo. Roberto Pinotti, accustomed as it is to document everything that the public was aware of the outcome of process? I rule that out as well and I'll put my hand on fire. So what? Then I wonder why Stefano Breccia, Abruzzo, Sammaciccia acquaintance, it was not documented before submitting the writer of sacred books, therapist, etc. as a person above Suspicion? Because it has reported only reviews cheering as the one written by P. Passionist Enrico Sammarco describing it as ".... The eagle touching dizzying heights, the Master confident, so at times, even serenity of understanding, requires a certain tension to keep up. When the Marhaba writes in his valuable volume to express the thought, the rest is absolutely crystal clear, our mutual friend and master, coincides with my thoughts in full. "The" poor people "who resorted to the judiciary were elderly couple, a pair mild honest people who were induced, with clever tricks, to squander an asset to people in the same sentence describes a certainly not in line with the profile outlined by Breccia. It 's true that death will erase everything. But if Gap had not exceeded the peak in the reverse I suppose anyone would have thought to bring up the past. I would be the first to draw a veil of silence over the memory of the pitiful represented aliens. That said, I think, is also proper to respect the memory of two elderly people who turned to the courts after having put in the hands of the defendants of 624 million lire, a real heritage, convinced that they are suffering from a serious disease that could be treated effectively only by a doctor friend of extraterrestrial Bruno Sammaciccia.fine third episode
(Continued)
